Main
Menu
|
|
|
Submissions |
|
Submit
a Review
If
you're involved in a horror movie, book or game and would like
to see it reviewed on HorrorWatch, click
here.
|
|
|
Snuff
|
|
A
film that could only be made in South America, where life is cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
Snuff
is the very definition of a horror movie. The horror is that people
watched it, the victim this time was me. Trying to capitalize
on the Manson murders, this film is kind of a recreation, maybe.
That's as accurate as I can be, because there's no real storyline,
just a bunch of hippies that kill people at random then speak
gibberish to each other.
The dialog is as stupid as possible, lots of utter nonsense like
"the butcher needs the jackel to cut his meat." I have no idea
what that's supposed to mean. When it made sense it was still
absolutely stupid.
The acting is literally the worst I've ever encountered. Every
college in America has a theater school filled with people who
would jump at the chance to dub the english on a movie, yet the
filmmakers decided to use people who could barely read the lines.
I'm talking intensely bad. There's no way you can imagine how
bad it really is. At one point a little girls voice is done by
what had to be an adult male pretending to be a little girl. My
God it was horrible.
Luckily, lots of people died. To make the film more entertaining
I pretended that they were really dying as punishment for being
in this film. Usually that works, but death was too good for them,
they should have been tortured first. By the time the first nudity
appeared, I couldn't enjoy it. My eyes had already dilated as
I slipped into a misery-induced coma.
The Mansonesque guy was named "Saton", how many seconds did they
put into thinking that one up? I'm guessing zero, which is how
long writing the movie would take for someone with an IQ of 71.
This movie actually created the urban legend of "snuff
films". There was a rumor that the Manson family had filmed their
activities. It wasn't true, but the filmmaker had just finished
this flick. He tacked on an ending where one of the actresses
is supposedly murdered by the film crew just for kicks. He then
hired people to follow the film around the country protesting
the "actual murder" in the film.
No, the killing wasn't real, it didn't even look remotely real.
But a legend was born because Findlay was a better ad-man than
movie-maker. If you decide to watch this movie, do yourself a
favor and fast forward to the last scene, you don't deserve to
suffer through it all.
|
|
Snuff
|
|
A
film that could only be made in South America, where life is cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
To
be fair the ending is nothing to do with the Findlay's. It
was purely the work of Producer/Distributor Allan Shackleton.
Around 1971 Mike and Roberta Findlay went to South America…where
wages are cheap…to make a film based on the still fresh in the
American mind 'Manson Murders'.
Titled Slaughter, the film was a badly dubbed (mostly Argentinian
actors were used), cheap and not so cheerful flick that secured
a handful of South American play dates before drifting off down
the river of slime that is the fate of scuzzy exploitation flicks
that fail to click with the discerning fans of such things.
But it would live again.
Roughly 5 years later Producer Allan Shackleton picked the film
up. Shackleton was an infamous man to work with. A hard line,
take the money and run, exploitation distributer. And he smelt
money in the flop that was "Slaughter".
He removed the final minutes of "Slaughter" (The Findlay's
denied any involvement in this, and Roberta especially never acknowledged
the film that "Slaughter" became as their film any longer)
and pasted on his own ending.
Reportedly shot by a Horacio Fredriksson and Simon Nuchtern.
This new finale shows the 'real' film crew finishing
the previous scene in "Slaughter", getting turned on
by the violence, and deciding to really kill the actress for the
camera! That the actress replacing the one in the Findlay's
actual movie, looks nothing at all like their actual actress seemed
unimportant. So we see the 'actress' tortured and eventually
murdered…Just before the camera supposedly runs out of film.
Thus was born one of the greatest marketing scams in the history
of film.
'Snuff' films were an obscure urban legend. Shadowed
rumours of unfortunates put in front of a camera and killed…For
real! It was a fledgling term at the time, but Shackleton would
catapult it into everyday life.
Releasing false reports to the Press that Police had 'discovered'
a film from South America ("Where life is cheap", as
Shakelton would famously say on his ad campaign for his film)
that supposedly showed a woman being really murdered.
It was a move that also tapped in to the public 'fear'
of those evil South American Dictatorships where masked men working
for the Government would torture, rape and kill undesirables in
dark cellars. The Press ate it up, and soon headlines about this
'snuff' film were screaming their free advertising around
the good old U.S of A.
Now was the time for Shackleton to unleash his monster! "Slaughter"
was now the aforementioned Snuff.
With wonderfully exploitative ads and protesters (hired by Shackelton)
standing outside some Cinemas showing the film, waving signs like
'Ban this filth' (you know, the old favourites), Shakleton
soon found he had a winner on his hands.
As the Press caught on to the hype, and real misguided protesters
started picketing the Grindhouse cinemas that were daring to show
the movie 'where an actress is REALLY KILLED', "Snuff"
was garnered with even more free publicity of the kind this type
of film thrives on.
And the rest is history....
|
|
Snuff
|
|
A
film that could only be made in South America, where life is cheap.
|
|
|
|
|
I
usually enjoy cheaply made, 70's exploitation flicks. The
fashions, music, filming styles, hell even the bad dubbing tends
to keep me relatively entertained. The only thing that kept this
movie in the DVD player was the fact that I was writing a review
for a completely different film at the same time, keeping my attention
sufficiently divided.
Did no one notice that actress that was supposedly killed at the
end looked nothing like any of the actresses in the film? Or that
the blood was the same tomato paste color that was used in the
film? Or that the camera work was still made up of different angles
and cuts? I think it’s safe to say that the do-gooders who were
protesting this thing never actually watched the movie.
While I didn’t hate it as much as The Horrorist, I’d only recommend
this to the biggest fans of the subgenre.
2 out of 10 movies that reminded me of a time when everyone topless
in movies had tan lines. Remember that? You don’t see that anymore.
|
(1976)
Michael Findlay, Roberta Findlay, A. Bochin
Margarita Amuchástegui
Ana Carro
Liliana Fernández Blanco
Roberta Findlay
Alfredo Iglesias
Enrique Larratelli
Mirtha Massa
Aldo Mayo
Clao Villanueva
Also known as: American Cannibale
|
|
Search
the Site |
|
|

|