Horrorwatch.com  
Movie Reviews | Book Reviews | Video Games | Articles | Horror Forums| Chatroom | Horrorshop
 
Main Menu


Submissions

Submit a Review

If you're involved in a horror movie, book or game and would like to see it reviewed on HorrorWatch, click here.

Saw
Every piece has a puzzle.
REVIEWED BY NFLAMES

Other than the Dawn of the Dead remake, I really haven't rabidly counted the days until a movie release this year. I'm sure everyone's heard the hype, and I'm sure that everyone is already tired of the now cliché reference to Seven, but let me tell you, after reading various other mediocre reviews, I was preparing myself for the worst, and that was to be disappointed. Definitely not so! Saw delivered on almost every front for me.

Saw opens up with two poor bastards, Adam the young “voyeur” and Lawrence, a seemingly uncaring Oncologist. Both wake up in a dark room a’la Cube, that is, they don’t remember how they got there, and they don’t know why they’re there either. The room is disgustingly filthy and there’s a victim of a suicide messily inhabiting the center of the room, and the wonderfully designed set greatly adds to the dank, dark reality of the film, you can almost smell the septic grime permeating the air.

Anyway, they quickly discover a few clues that vaguely explain to them why they’re there, and what they need to do to get out alive. Their tasks are somewhat simple, Lawrence is tasked to kill Adam, and Adam is tasked to simply survive the ordeal, problem is, they are chained to opposite sides of the room and unable to reach each other. Thrown into the mix are some interesting plot items, including the two tools the movie is named after, a couple hacksaws.

The film focuses mainly on Adam and Lawrence dealing with emotions like denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. But we do get to delve a bit into the mind of the captor, simply dubbed “The Jigsaw Killer” by the police, but it is also noted, that he’s never actually killed anyone, but that he’s a master of getting victims to kill themselves. We learn from flashbacks that Jigsaw devises well thought out and elaborate traps and puzzles that force his victims to either kill themselves, or other poor victims thrown into these sadistic puzzles, and believe me, every single part of every trap and puzzle is extremely twisted! Jigsaw doesn’t necessarily pick random victims, no he chooses those who need to be enlightened that life is to be reveled in and taken seriously because so many people take their time on earth for granted. A killer with an agenda like that? Hmmm? Actually this is the only piece of the movie that was reminiscent of Seven

Other reviews elsewhere state that the movie drags on, but I disagree, there were slow points to the movie, but these parts WERE telling the story, things such as why Adam and Lawrence were picked, why they were chosen to be in the same puzzle, the importance of Lawrence’s family regardless of his actions or mistakes. Plus there’s a ton of misdirection, and deceit in store for the viewer. I can pretty much guarantee that when you think you have it figured out, YOU DON’T! The ending literally found me slack-jawed, with my eyes bugging out like a damn cartoon character, I never saw it coming, and it really was original.

Other reviews I’ve seen also bitch that there weren’t adequate clues given as to the outcome of the movie, to that I interject SO WHAT? This movie is built upon growing layers of misdirection, do you bitch about these things when a magician does them? No! I love it when I get stumped, because it’s so rare these days. Regardless of what others say, I REALLY dug it! I found myself getting pissed towards the end and ready to write a slam review, but it was misdirection at work, and it paid off in spades when the “twist” hit.

Some of the low points I noted was the bumbling cop angle, where they made Danny Glover and his partner out to be the stereotypical inept gumshoes, who forego warrants and such to get their guy based solely on a hunch, among other bumbling detective clichés. Another minor issue was there was a lot less gore than I expected, it’s on par with Seven in that department, maybe even a bit better, but I was just expecting more based on the trailers, the hype, and even the movie posters.

A great movie by semi-newcomers James Wan, and Leigh Whannell (Whannell plays Adam in the movie and does a damn fine job!) Add the LOUD industrial-metal type soundtrack (Fear Factory rolls during the credits) and you’ve got a winner on your hands in my book. So much better than I expected!

9 out of 10 Kidneys on Ebay


Saw
Every piece has a puzzle.
REVIEWED BY THE HORRORIST

Saw is a very well-done flick, the tension is very affecting and the story's not exactly poorly thought out, either. I enjoyed it completely. There were lots of squirm-inducing scenes that are just plain hard to ignore. A great plot, really.

I've complained about twist endings but I'm not saying I hate them or think they're bad at all. I just don't want all movies to have them. If all movies have twist endings, they'll become like Twilight Zones where you spend the movie trying to figure it out, that's not what I want. I want scary, fuck clever, write a damn limerick if you want to be clever at me. Cleverness is overrated, horror is about scary.

However, when you have an ending as good as this one, you should definitely use it. This twist makes the film scarier by far. When it was unveiled I got a little chill, not just realizing, but as the realization sunk in, the ramifications and such. Like I said, damn fine.

October '04 was a hell of a month for horror, that's for sure. Two of the best movies I've seen in a long time back to back, The Grudge and now Saw, both highly recommended for all. See them while they're still in theaters, DVD's are great but just not the same. 10/10


Saw
Every piece has a puzzle.
REVIEWED BY LORD J
Despite the fact that one of my friends accidentally gave away the ending, I still really enjoyed Saw. I'm intrigued by killers like the Jigsaw Killer who think their doing their victims or the world a favor, when in fact, they're just demented freaks who get of on the suffering of others. The kills were very creative and quite twisted. I only wish there were more. I loved the dank restroom setting. This movie also had a couple of decent scares, as well. Okay, there were only two, but they were both really good.

Now for the stuff I didn't like. The movie explains WHY the Jigsaw Killer chose some of his victims (not all of them), but it doesn't explain HOW. They did things that were less than righteous, but nothing that a thousand others haven't done. So HOW did he choose this particular set of people? Were they just conveniently around him in his everyday life or what? I also noticed that the Jigsaw Killer himself was guilty of the exact same thing as one of his chosen victims. I think we may have a hypocrite on our hands here.

There were some inconsistencies with some of the characters and their motivations. I won't go into detail, but if you're forced to do something, you probably wouldn't take pleasure in doing it. Also, I counted at least 3 scenes where characters completely lost their common sense. Now I'll admit, these were high stress situations, but given the alternatives, I would've dug down deep to find the smallest bit of rational thought.

I'm giving this movie 7 out of 10 things you don't want in your closet. Give or take a .5 since I already knew the ending.

Saw
Every piece has a puzzle.
REVIEWED BY WL PAYNECRAFT
I thought this was a good movie, and this isn’t really my genre of horror. I’m not big on killers or slashers really. I am only going to touch on a couple things as the main things have been explained quite well in the previous posts.

First, I thought Cary Elwes did as good a job as any. It was a very peculiar position he was put in and I could attribute any of the acting inconsistencies that he might have had to that. Danny Glover’s character was a fucking dolt. I was totally expecting one time for him to pull the trigger on his gun and a bouquet of flowers to pop out. Then he would step into a mop bucket and put his hand on a hot oven. Nevermind him and his partner missed some key crime scene follow up that, in my opinion would have ended the movie somewhat earlier.

I also didn’t like the omniscience of the killer. He knew too much about everybody. Plus, it seemed that he was a bit hypocritical in how he dosed out murders. I could have sworn that one guy didn’t deserve the death he got, but I could have been uninformed.

Also, I think the ending was too cute. If it would have ended the way it looked like it was going to, I would have enjoyed it more. I would love to elaborate more on this, but I don’t want to spoil it, even though I am probably the only person in America who hadn’t seen this movie by now.

It also looks like it intentionally set itself up for a sequel. Bad money making machine! Bad!

Overall, a good movie. I give it 8 out of 10 reasons to quit smoking.

Saw
Every piece has a puzzle.
REVIEWED BY JAREPRIME
I'm a little late but checked this one out tonight on DVD. I loved the opening 15 minutes and the closing 10 minutes, it's the middle section where Saw loses it's steam.

I didn't need all of the back story on the two main characters and I thought the whole cop and wife side story was unneeded. Saw would have been awesome if it would have stayed with the two guys in the room, and if the killer just kept messing with their heads and trying to turn them against one another. To me this was when Saw was at it's best.

I also thought the character of Gordon became less and less interesting as the movie went on, but I did love the pale look of him at the end. I did however think the scenes of the killer creeping around in the pig mask were creepy as hell.

In the end Saw is pretty fair, but I thought it had some very goofy parts as well like, the killer decked out in ceremony robes and the way too elaborate ending, but it also has a few clever moments in it as well.

Saw
Every piece has a puzzle.
REVIEWED BY SIR WIGGLE
Let's begin by saying that I liked this film. I liked it enough that I will eventually buy it and add it to my measly collection. The ending blew me away, but I'm easy to astound. However, there were some things that had me saying, "Why?" and "Huh?"

For example, why all of the red drapes over all of the tables in the killer's hideout? And, as Prime mentioned, why the long black robe? I didn't get it.

On an different note, my very intelligent girlfriend, who is not a fan of the genre but wanted to see this film, added that she thought the name of the film was interesting. I thought the name of the film was taken because of the use of the hacksaws. But like I mentioned earlier, she's smarter than I am and she thought the name of the film came from the fact that the killer "saw" the results of each of his puzzles. Interesting thought, huh? I think I'll keep her around a while longer.

8 out of 10 Jawbreakers that would make Wonka cringe.

Saw
Every piece has a puzzle.
REVIEWED BY SPLATTERSCRIBE
Maybe it's that I've already seen the "psycho as philosophical messiah" plot laid out in the far superior "Seven", but I just didn't like "Saw."
Jigsaw was actually a decent character, and I do think the ending is effective (so much so that I was pissed the rest of the film didn't carry the same vibe), but for most of the running time of "Saw" I found myself staring at two guys who -ultimately- I didn't give a rats ass about.

My most direct complaint is leveled against Elwes. I disliked his character so much I was cheering for him to meet a grisly demise, which in turn diluted the overall effect of the film. Kind of hard to find a lot of menace in Jigsaw when I'm actually rooting for him to successfully pull off his diabolical plan with one of the two main characters.

I just cannot recommend this movie. I have to place this in the "needlessly overhyped and monumentally dissapointing " catagory.
Nicely creative torture/death sequences though and, again, a good ending. For that, I'll give "Saw":

Two out of Ten Twisted Traps

Saw
Every piece has a puzzle.
REVIEWED BY BLOODY TACO
Wow, am I bummed. I was so looking forward to this, but I came away dissappointed.

There is so much creativity in this film's first 45 minutes that I sat there stunned and grinning at virtually everything I was seeing. It was brilliant.

And then...well, suffice it to say that one "touching" exchange had me laughing out loud (I hereby apologize to the people in the row ahead of me; I just couldn't help myself). The twist at the end is also one of the most improbable things I have ever seen in this type of movie. It would have been far better if they had just let the plot run its natural course. This "twist" didn't leave me shaking or thinking of the horror of humanity, it just left me wondering what in the hell they were thinking when they wrote it.

The casting didn't help either; I didn't believe Cary Elwes for a single moment of this movie. His backstory was barely written (it would have been better if they hadn't made the attempt), and there were two "characters" in the film who were only there as a gimmick to provide tension for another character.

As it is though, don't go in expecting anything remotely close to realism, and you'll enjoy it. It is, visually, remarkable; it's gritty and dark and inspired. Too bad the script wasn't given as much attention.

Rating: 5 out of 10 attempts to grab that damn cellphone almost made it!

(2004) James Wan, Leigh Whannell

Leigh Whannell .... Adam
Cary Elwes .... Dr. Lawrence Gordon
Danny Glover .... Detective David Tapp
Ken Leung .... Detective Steven Sing
Dina Meyer .... Kerry
Mike Butters .... Paul
Paul Gutrecht .... Mark
Michael Emerson .... Zep Hindle
Benito Martinez .... Brett
Shawnee Smith .... Amanda
Makenzie Vega .... Diana Gordon
Monica Potter .... Alison Gordon
Ned Bellamy .... Jeff
Alexandra Bokyun Chun .... Carla
Avner Garbi .... Father



Search the Site

Custom Search



hit counter
Horrorwatch, Horrorwatch.com and all content © 2003 - 2010


Horrorfind Banner Exchange