|
Yes,
I am back, and I am now reviewing movies based on classical literature.
“Paynecraft, have you lost your mind? There are no zombies or
arena sized plot holes in classical literature?” Fear not my numerous
loyal fans, I will be back reviewing low-grade horror in no time!
This movie is based on a novel by Oscar Wilde (sounds like an
adult movie star), and for the most part stays true to it. The
story is a good one and is the reason that I wanted to watch the
movie.
An artist by the name of Basil Hallward does this portrait of
a very pretty guy named Dorian Gray (yeah, no shit Paynecraft).
The portrait bears a striking resemblance to its subject, and
the artist considers it his best work. Basil’s friend Lord Henry
Wotton and Dorian himself both agree. At this point, Lord Henry
comments to Dorian about how beauty is only temporary and soon
you will be old and ugly. Dorian laments about this and boldly
proclaims that he wishes this portrait would grow old while he
remained young forever. He would sell his soul for this. Well,
guess what kiddies? That’s right, it happens.
Basically what happens is that Dorian can have a free ride and
do whatever kind of debauchery he wants and the portrait absorbs
the guilt side of it. The catch is, the more and more that Dorian
slips into this pattern of decadence, the more and more it appears
that he is losing his soul. The painting, and the guilt that it
represents, is driving him mad. For each evil thing that Dorian
does, the portrait changes a little, until it is hardly recognizable.
This notion disturbs young Dorian. All the while, Dorian does
not age in appearance. Not a bad gig, except for the soul forfeiture
part in the end.
I like this concept. It tugs at our inner morals and beliefs.
Most of you might say that you wouldn’t make this deal, but I
bet you thought about it. Let’s face it, if you never die, you
never have to give your soul up. And hopefully by the time you
decide to hang it up, good has prevailed over evil and you don’t
have to honor your deal. A dire gamble indeed. Anyway, enough
philosophical mumbo jumbo, let’s get onto the good stuff (you
know what I’m talking about).
Cue the cricket noises and the tumbleweed floating across your
monitor. No gore, little violence, no nudity! Ahhh, what can you
expect? There was a bit of implied violence here and there. There
were a couple knifings and suicides and acid baths. Not bad. I’ll
take it!
The acting was good and the story flowed well. It was slow at
times. It was good enough just to keep me mildly interested. This
is an older movie. I believe it came out in 1973. This is the
year that brought you such great things as The Exorcist, and yours
truly! I’m blushing, stop it!
This movie could have really went off the violence and nudity
meter if it was made nowadays. Dorian and Lord Wotton were some
partying conscienceless bastards. Sprinkle in a little homoerotic
subtleties, and you have the perfect recipe for mischief, or at
least a good hard R flick.
This movie wasn’t bad. It was a little slow at times and apparently
is about 30 years old. Still yet, I wasn’t disappointed. The storyline
is solid.
I give it 4 out of 10 Lord Wottons. This guy is a bastard, but
he’s my kind of bastard.
This review was inspired by my apparent lack of culture as of
late (yes, I consider this culture. Sad but true). I’m over it
now. Back to the plotless zombiefests!
|