Horrorwatch.com
Movie Reviews | Book Reviews | Video Games | Articles | Horror Forums| Chatroom | Horrorshop
 
Main Menu


Submissions

Submit a Review

If you're involved in a horror movie, book or game and would like to see it reviewed on HorrorWatch, click here.

Night Junkies
VAMPIRES
Reviewed by jareprime
What if blood was an addiction?

Set in the winding streets and dark alleyways of riverside London, the story centers on Ruby and Vincent. Ruby works as a lap dancer whose "pimp" is intent on promoting her as a call girl. Vincent was bitten by a femme fatale In a dark alleyway, and after weeks of battling with his condition, he has finally give in to his addiction: blood. Vincent had become a vampire!

Vincent and Ruby meet through happenstance in a London café and fall in love during one special night. Vincent tries to feed on Ruby to satisfy his addiction which goes against his heart. Ruby escapes, but has now been 'turned' and has also become a vampire. Because of Ruby's dark past, she has always been a fighter. Her father was a heroin addict who killed himself in the next room when she was a little girl. After she has turned into a vampire, she keeps getting creepy flashbacks about him. Unsure of what is happening to her, she returns to Vincent who in now remorseful and convinces her to stay and hopefully work things out. Together hey try to go 'cold turkey' on their blood addiction. Ruby's previous 'owners' want their star girl back and Matt, a man from her recent past, seeks her out.

Made for under $100,000, the production value is exceptionally good. Since the movie was low budget, you might expect typical low budget acting, but surprisingly the actors did a really good job. I especially liked Giles Alderson as Vincent. Lawrence Pearce also found some beautiful women to play the strippers. They are some of the hottest women I've seen in a vampire flick, and yes, there's plenty of nudity. This movie has an addicting sexiness that grabs you from the start. In fact, this movie has a sexiness that most vampire movies forget to include.

The dialogue is very Tarantino-esque and his influence is obvious as well. Not that this is a bad thing, some of the dialogue is fantastic and this movie offers some decent quotables. We also get some really great scenes, for instance, after Ruby turns, she is involved in a dominatrix fantasy with a John. He's bound, naked and bending over. She then grabs a strap-on dildo and is about to apply it when she faints from the changes that she's going through.

This movie seems very misogynistic at times. There are several scenes where women are beaten. One woman is beaten to death by a man who then proceeds to lick the blood off of her face.

The action scenes were decent, but there could have been more of them and there wasn't too much gore, but vampire movies shouldn't have all that much. There is, however, an ample amount of blood that is used very nicely. The way this movie was made, it's almost hard to tell that it's low budget.

What sets this movie apart from other vampire movies is the vampires themselves. They are protrayed as real people, but just have been dealt a "bad hand." They have no supernatural powers except for some enhanced senses and there was no evidence of them being stronger than an ordinary human. The vampires in this movie are junkies. Their addiction is blood, and when Ruby is sitting in a hotel room trying to quit "cold turkey" she was going through withdrawal. This reminded me a bit of [b]Trainspotting[/b].

The bites are also different from typical vampires. They are not immortal. Instead of the two marks on the neck, we are shown a full human bite mark. The standard weaknesses aren't in play either. Holy water and garlic don't work, although sunlight causes their skin to crisp up. It seems the best way to kill them is by a stake through the heart, a bullet in the head, or by draining all of their blood. Of course any ordinary human would die with these methods as well.

While this was very good, there is some bad but not much. The only bad I can think of is that it's not as graphic as I would have liked and the story moves very slowly and plays out as a horror/drama.

This is Lawrence Pearce's first film and it's done very well. Like I said, it runs a bit slow and it's more dramatic than action-packed, but if you like vampire movies that are out of the norm, you may enjoy this movie. The movie will be released in the US on DVD in July of 2007. Personally, I can't wait for the US Release or the sequel.

Even though the movie moved really slow and more action would have been very welcome, I'm giving this 8 out of 10 strippers that I would actually pay for.


(2006) Lawrence Pearce

Giles Alderson ... Vincent
René Zagger
Sasha Jackson ... Sabrina
Mark Joseph ... Shady
Katia Winter ... Ruby Stone
Beverley Eve ... Party Girl
Jonathan Coyne
Vass Anderson
Jaspreet Singh Grewal ... Barman
Arpad Godla ... Punter (uncredited)


Search the Site

Custom Search


 


hit counter
Horrorwatch, Horrorwatch.com and all content © 2003 - 2010


Horrorfind Banner Exchange