|
I
heard rumors about a French horror film that was too intense to
be released in American theaters. After finding out that the duo
responsible for this film, Alexandre Bustillo & Julien Maury,
were set to work on the upcoming Hellraiser remake, and
reading some very positive reviews, I could not resist the opportunity
to attend a limited screening of Inside (À l'intérieur).
After the first 30 minutes or so, I feared that I had let my expectations
get too high. By the end of the final frame of the movie, I knew
that I could not have been more wrong. This is undoubtedly one
of the best horror films that I have ever seen.
In
one tragic moment during the middle of her pregnancy, our heroine
Sarah is involved in a deadly two car collision. She and her unborn
child survived. The love of her life and father of her child did
not. 5 months later, the now widowed Sarah is spending Christmas
alone. It will be her last night alone as she will be going in
to the hospital to have labor induced the next day. Only we will
soon find out
Sarah is not alone.
In
the middle of the night, there is a knock at the door. The woman
on the other side claims that she has just been in an accident
and asks if she can come in to use the phone. An untrusting Sarah
refuses the woman entry, and rightly so. It soon becomes apparent
that this female stranger knows quite a bit about Sarah, her dead
husband & their unborn child. In fact, this woman is not only
determined to get inside the house
she is determined to
get what is inside Sarah.
Inside
is an example of modern day film-making at its best. It takes
a simple premise of a woman being trapped inside her house by
a deranged lunatic and turns it into something truly spectacular.
The
first thing that makes this movie great are the performances of
the two female leads, especially Beatrice Dalle as the stranger.
This woman was seriously disturbed, yet diabolical, calculating
and very driven. Her determination to get what she wants was almost
inhuman, yet her motivations (which we discover towards the end
of the film) are very human and almost make her sympathetic in
a twisted sort of way.
The
second is the setting and the way it was utilized. The mayhem
takes place in a secluded house in the woods. The way this setting
was filmed creates a sense of isolation, and given the fact that
our lead could go into labor at any moment, a greater sense of
helplessness. There is also a great use of light and shadows in
the house. The stranger wears a black dress and blends seamlessly
into the darkness to the point where the viewer sees her in every
shadow. Excellent use of psychology.
Oh
and by the way, it is with good reason that Inside (À l'intérieur)
did not get a theatrical release in the U.S. and it is not
because this is straight-to-DVD fare. This film is just far too
violent and bloody to be shown in any American theater. Im
not talking about the fun over-the-top gore of movies like Hatchet
or Planet Terror.
Im talking about the brutal unrelenting violence of a movie
like High Tension, only turned up a several notches. I saw this
at a horror convention in a small theater filled with seasoned
gore-hound veterans, and a number of scenes had the majority of
us begging for mercy. There was only one scene where the blood
seemed a bit over the top, but just one.
This
movie is not without flaws, such as a WTF moment involving survival
logic (or lack thereof), and an above-average but seemingly unspectacular
first third of the movie. But the film as a whole more than makes
up for any flaws
by a longshot! There is a good chance that
I am writing this review too closely after seeing the movie and
havent fully let it digest, but my gut instinct tells me
that Inside is a modern day masterpiece, and could be an instant
classic, and one that I will definitely be adding to my horror
collection the very moment it hits DVD.
10
out of 10 worst case scenarios involving a cigarette and an aerosol
spray can. YIKES!!!
|