Horrorwatch.com  
Movie Reviews | Book Reviews | Video Games | Articles | Horror Forums| Chatroom | Horrorshop
 
Main Menu

Movie Reviews
Aliens
Animals
Creatures
Demons
Exploitation
Hauntings
Humans
Occult
Slashers
Vampires
Werewolves
Zombies
Other
Complete List
Other Reviews
TV Series
Books
Games
Features & Columns
The Front Page
Articles & Interviews
Horror Forums
Chatroom
HorrorShop
Submit a Review
Horror Links
Link to HorrorWatch
FAQ & Site Info



Submissions

Submit a Review

If you're involved in a horror movie, book or game and would like to see it reviewed on HorrorWatch, click here.

House of 9
Nine strangers, one house, only one will get out... alive.
SLASHERS
Reviewed by GeneralCinema

Nine people with no apparent connection are drugged, kidnapped, and put in a house with no way out. There are seventy-five cameras and just as many hidden microphones all over the house. It seems that an eccentric lunatic is behind everything and he will offer five million dollars to the person who walks out alive.

Blah. Blah. Blah. That's pretty much the plot. There have been better "group-trapped-in-inescapable-situations-and-have-to-kill-each-other" movies. Cube and Saw II come to mind. What sets this movie apart from those is that the accents are among the WORST I have ever heard. Did you ever want to hear Dennis Hopper use a fake Irish accent? Me either. Speaking of Dennis Hopper, he's totally out of place in this movie. Out of everything they could have gotten him to play, he plays...a priest. Yeah, Dennis Hopper as a priest works about as well as Keanu Reeves as an English Aristocrat. Dennis Hopper seems to be at his best when he's playing a dickhead in some capacity. They should have captialized on that.

Before I go any farther, the nine people that are kidnapped are: a priest; a dancer; a designer; an aspiring rapper; a former tennis pro; a woman on probation; an unsuccessful composer and his wife; and a detective. This could have been GREAT if it was actually a character study. Sadly we get to know the characters for all of ONE SCENE. After that we're supposed to relate to them I guess. Oh well, after that scene they're all disposable anyway.

The acting could have been much better. The fake accents (some were real, but the fake ones were REALLY fake) took away any semblance of believability in the characters, and because there's little plot supposition on the characters, we don't know what they're motives could be for wanting the money. Consistency with the characters and motives would have been greatly appreciated.

It's also pretty boring. Not much happens for the first half of the movie and during the second half, the kills aren't so bad, but without knowing the who/why about the characters they don't really mean anything.

The movie does give us a good amount of blood, however. That seems to be a trick of bad horror movies - don't give them plot or substance, give them blood! This is definitely one cliche I could do without. The movie give us no nudity but some of the chicks have decent bodies. Honestly, the best part of this movie was seeing Kelly Brook's ass shots. There's a good amount of them in this.

I've had this DVR'd since May. I'm upset that it took me this long to see it, but I'm even more upset that the wait was NOT worth it.

4 out of 10


(2005) Steven R. Monroe, Philippe Vidal

Dennis Hopper ... Father Duffy
Kelly Brook ... Lea
Hippolyte Girardot ... Francis
Susie Amy ... Claire Leevy
Morven Christie ... Shona
Peter Capaldi ... Max Roy
Ashley Walters ... Al B
Raffaello Degruttola ... Jay
Julienne Davis ... Cynthia
Jim Carter ... The Watcher

Search the Site

Custom Search



 


hit counter
Horrorwatch, Horrorwatch.com and all content © 2003 - 2008


Horrorfind Banner Exchange