Main
Menu
|
|
|
Submissions |
|
Submit
a Review
If
you're involved in a horror movie, book or game and would like
to see it reviewed on HorrorWatch, click
here.
|
|
|
The
Hills Have Eyes
|
|
The
lucky ones die first.
|
|
|
|
|
The
Carter family is on a cross country drive when their RV breaks
down in the middle of nowhere. With cell phones on the blink,
the Carter’s decide to make due but soon learn that they are not
alone. In the desolate desert surroundings a strange family is
stalking them, or more accurately, hunting them. Two things are
for sure, they are not alone and the hills have eyes.
The remake of the 1977 Wes Craven classic has hit the screens
and I have to say I was fairly impressed. The Hills Have Eyes
’06 is a pretty gritty and intense little flick, I was a fan of
the original and I have to say that this one holds true to it’s
classic roots, yet adds a few new leaves to the tree.
First we actually get a little back story on the cannibal clan
that’s lurking about, and it works. It really gave the film a
kind of “Hey it could happen” vibe which I really liked and it
was done really well.
Also the effects and the cast were both extremely well done. I
especially liked the performances of Ted Levine, who puts on a
few pounds and plays a beefed-up tough guy, and Billy Drago who
plays an uber-creepy cannibal. What surprised me the most was
Aaron Stafford as Doug. Aaron played Pyro in X2 so you
may have seen him before, but in this film he really shows some
serious acting ability and I really enjoyed watching his character
grow, especially in the last segment of the film.
The kills and the killers both look good as K.N.B. Effects do
another top notch job, but I wish that on a few occasions they
would have went just a touch more brutal, but all and all everything
is very well done and very believable.
I do have one major gripe about this film that I wish they would
have done without, the whole cell phone and technology thing was
just way too predictable and clichéd by this point. If they would
have set the remake in the 70’s or early 80’s it would have gotten
rid of this flaw, but other than that this flick is pretty sweet.
Written and directed by the Alexandre Aja, the man behind High
Tension, The Hills Have Eyes remake is damn fine
and with two good flicks under his belt, Aja may become one of
the new kings of horror.
The best thing I can say about this film is that not only will
it please new fans, but fans of the original as well and that’s
all you can really ask of a remake. If you’ve seen the classic
go watch this one, if you watch the remake, do yourself a favor
and rent the classic this weekend, either way your gonna get a
good flick.
7 of 10
|
|
The
Hills Have Eyes
|
|
The
lucky ones die first.
|
|
|
|
|
I
was completely blown away with the quality of this flick. If all
the remakes were done like this, having everything good about
the movie being the same or better, than I'd be all for remaking
everything.
This is one scarily intense flick, full of brutality and gory
goodness.
Unlike Prime, I do understand that all movies from now on can't
all be set in the 70's or early 80's to avoid cell phones.
It's a crazy idea, especially considering there are lots
of places without cell towers. Lots, fool.
There was a grittiness about this movie that was very appealing,
and the violence was so frantic it was unnerving at times. I felt
both of these gave it much in common with the original Texas
Chainsaw Massacre in that regard.
I did have a couple complaints, the biggest being if your dogs
run off every time you open the door and never come when you call
them, either put them on a leash or train them, dammit! There
are no bad dogs, just bad owners!
Anyway, great flick. I was a fan of the first one and actually
do feel that you can use this one to replace it if you want. It's
that good. [authors note: I've actually watched the original again
since writing this, and no longer feel this way, the original
is really cool in some ways that can't be lost forever. Forgive
my excitement.]
8 out of 10 really elaborate ways to kill someone when you're
holding a gun with seven shells in it. (hint: instead of shooting
backwards while running forward, turn and aim)
|
|
The
Hills Have Eyes
|
|
The
lucky ones die first.
|
|
|
|
|
I just got back from seeing this in theaters and had to review
it right away. I have not had a movie bring out so much emotion
with me in years. I was so damn angry I just wanted to jump into
the screen and dismember these demented hillbilly freaks with
my bare hands! This film was brutal and grotesque. It held nothing
back except what the rating board forced it to. It was very well
made with superb attention to detail and fantastic acting performances
all the way around.
The men in this movie were all pathetic wimps! I found myself
more angry at these pussies at times than I was at the hillbillies.
Example? Fine! If you stumbled upon some freak eating your mother
while you were carrying a gun in your hand what would you do?
Would you turn and run away like a 7 year old girl? ME NEITHER!
I would have charged that cannibal redneck and shot him in his
face followed with grabbing the nearest rock and smashing his
head into MUSH!
I probably sound pretty nutty right now* but that's what
this film does to you.
I recomend it if you are not the squeamish type however be prepared
to get emotionally involved.
7.5 out of 10 gun haters that's opinion will forever change
*Editor's
note: It's not really time specific.
|
|
The
Hills Have Eyes
|
|
The
lucky ones die first.
|
|
|
|
The first post I left on Horrowatch was a review of the recent
Omen remake. In that post, I lamented that though technically
well made,the new version of The
Omen is so devoted to following the blue print of the
original version that it holds no surprises for anyone who has
actually SEEN the original version.
The people responsible for the new The Hills Have Eyes
could teach the people behind the new Omen a lesson or
two about how to film a remake.
Exciting and brutally violent (I watched the unrated dvd version),
the new Hills is a cinematic slam dunk.
THIS is how you execute a remake. Use the same basic premise as
the classic original. Make the family in peril likeable and human,
take the vile antagonists and render them even MORE despicable,
then crank up the action and gore to a nice, direspectable level
(There's carnage to spare in this bloodbath).
I'd like to take a moment to recognize the superb performance
of Aaron Stanford as Doug Bukowski, the son-in-law who ends up
in a free-for-all fight for his life. I have no idea who this
guy is or whether or not this was his film debut, but he's
a real find. He embodies his character with enough quirkiness
to make him absolutely believable, and as the film progressed
I found myself first warming up to then outright cheering for
the man. It's been a long time since I've had such an
emotional investment in a character in a horror movie, but damned
if it didn't matter to me whether or not Doug Bukowski survived.
I have nothing negative to say about this film. There was one
sequence where I though we were gonna get the classic "guy
barricades the door only to have the villian pop through the window
behind him" routine, only to have THAT scene resolve itself
with a surprise.
Bottom line - I was never bored, constantly on the edge of my
seat and thoroughly entertained. I would definitely recommend
this flick to any horror fan. A success by any definition of the
word.
Ten out of Ten Pissed off German Shepards
|
(2006)
Alexandre Aja, Wes Craven
Aaron Stanford .... Doug Bukowski
Kathleen Quinlan .... Ethel Carter
Vinessa Shaw .... Lynne Bukowski
Emilie de Ravin .... Brenda Carter
Dan Byrd .... Bobby Carter
Robert Joy .... Lizard
Ted Levine .... Bob Carter
Desmond Askew .... Big Brain
Tom Bower
Ezra Buzzington .... Goggle
Maisie Camilleri Preziosi .... Baby Catherine
Billy Drago .... Jupiter
Laura Ortiz .... Ruby
Michael Bailey Smith .... Pluto
|
|
Search
the Site |
|
|
|