|
Dreamcatcher
is an adaptation of Stephen King's book of the same name. It's
about four friends with psychic powers and aliens invading the
planet through some very nasty and often amusing infections.
I'm
not sure what to say about this movie. Did I enjoy it? Yes, but
I don't know if it was a good movie or not. I was really looking
forward to seeing it and wasn't really disappointed. It would
have been better as a mini-series, but I think all King's books
would be. His short stories make better movies than his books
do, there's just too much to be lost when compressing him into
a couple hours.
Of
course the book was better, not just for the normal reasons but
because I think if I hadn't read it first lots of it would have
seemed odd or difficult to understand. The pacing and introductions
were a lot better in the book, several plot points that are well
developed in the book were explained in (awkward) conversations
in the film. But that's often true of any movie based on a book,
especially with something as long and rich as King's work.
I
don't know whether I'll buy the DVD or not, which is how I judge
a flick. Maybe in a couple months the mood will strike me to see
it again, and I'll buy. Some movies grow on you, or in the case
of the aliens in Dreamcatcher, they grow in you.
6
out of 10 crapweasels
|