Main
Menu
|
|
|
|
|
Bram
Stoker's Dracula
|
|
Love
never dies.
|
| VAMPIRES |
Reviewed
by NFlames
|
|
This
is it, the quintessential vampire movie. Based on Bram Stoker's
1897 gothic masterpiece "Dracula." There are many arguments as
to who was Stoker's influence for The Count, and the most rabid
purists insist that it is NOT Vlad the Impaler. However, this
movie forms it's basis around the Vlad story, and I'm obliged
to agree that this is the most familar of all the various versions
of the tale of Count Dracula, and whether or not this is where
Stoker got his influence is a moot point and does not make this
film any less of a masterpiece.
We begin with the young Count, a ruthless warrior on his way to
defend against the enemies of Christ by battling the Muslim Turks
. Acting on rage and a barbarian instinct the count impaled countless
Turks across the countryside gernering him the title of "Vlad
the Impaler." Although victorious, one day an arrow is shot into
the castle of the Count with an attached note stating that the
Count has fallen in battle. Distraught, Count Dracula's young
bride pens a suicide note before plummeting hundreds of feet to
the sea below.
Count Dracula returns to find the corpse of his bride at an altar,
and laments how a God he fought so valiantly for could allow this
to happen. Insult is added to injury by a priest who states that
The Count's beloved wife will never find heaven because she took
her own life thus damning her soul for eternity. Count Dracula
then renounces Christ, and thrusts his sword into the crucifix
causing a flow of the blood of life, which he then drinks turning
him into the immortal bloodsucker we all know and love.
This movie is so well made I could go on for pages. However, I
have never liked reading lengthy reviews of anything so I'll try
to keep it to a minimum.
Casting for the movie is fantastic. I don't care much for Winona
Ryder or Keanu Reeves, but the performances of Gary Oldman, Tom
Waits, and Anthony Hopkins' masterful portrayal of Van Helsing
more than make up for this oversight. The sets were epic, the
use of shadowing was amazing. Basically this movie does a lot
of what other vampire movies fail to do and that is to explain
Dracula's aversion to mirrors (vanity disgusts him), crucifixes
(he renounced Christ remember?), why he has to sleep in his native
soil, etc. Dracula also keeps a pretty impressive stable of half-naked
vampi concubines (one played by the beautiful Monica Bellucci.)
The three of which alone satisfy this movies nudity quota.
Gary Oldman is by far the best Dracula ever. Showing the Count
in all of his guises, wolves, bats, rats, old, young. He turns
womens tears into diamonds (I hate when guys do that, how can
we lesser mortals even compete with that?) More simply put, he's
charming as hell, or slicker than whale shit in an ice flow if
you will.... Waits' insect chomping Renfield is also one of the
more notable performances of the film.
On a negative note, Winona Ryder, and Mr. Reeves should never
ever attempt an english accent again. It was almost painful to
watch these two act amongst so many other talents of biblical
proportions.
I'm a vampire nut, so I hold this movie in as high a regard as
most horrorphiles hold The Exorcist. It does for the vampire genre
what Dawn did for zombies, what American Werewolf did for werewolves,
you get the picture. If you haven't seen it, leave now, and go
get it. Great story, plenty of nudity and plasma, and the purest
translation of Stoker's novel yet.
10 out of 10 penis biting vampire nymphos
|
|
Bram
Stoker's Dracula
|
|
Love
never dies.
|
| VAMPIRES |
Reviewed
by Bloody Taco
|
|
Sorry
guys, but I have to disagree on this one. There's a reason
why Francis Ford Coppola's version of "Bram Stoker's
Dracula" failed at the box office (and with critics), and
it wasn't because it's overlong (it is) and boring (yawn,
yawn, yawn...is it over? No? Yawn.). Nor is it because I kept
waiting to hear a pre-"Matrix" Keanu Reeves call Gary
Oldman "Drac-dude." It's because Coppola, that
sick bastard, forces us to watch a bloated Anthony Hopkins make
out with Winona Ryder (whom, I believe I read somewhere, stole
her own wardrobe for the role). That is easily the scariest
scene of the film and, although the back of the video box claims
I'll "never forget it," it's not for lack
of trying. If I were gay, the vision I have of Anthony Hopkins
shoving his tongue down my throat would give the phrase "scared
straight" a whole new meaning, but I digress.
However...Tom Waits as Renfeild??? BRILLIANT!! Because of him
and Oldman, who is the only actor who can make me forget who he
is time and time again, I give "Drac" 1 star...although
I really only wanna give it .5
It *is* very close to the book, but 80% of the book is pretty
dull, too. In regards to the film: not scary, not engaging, but
the matte paintings are nice!
|
|
Search
the Site |
|
|
|